The case involved MARTA’s Mobility Services program, which caters to paying public transportation users who need a little extra time or assistance because of various mobility or other health issues. MARTA ignored the offer, and the case proceeded to trial. Plaintiff had offered to settle the case for $5,000,000. The Judge granted the fees under the plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s fees based upon MARTA’s failure to accept the plaintiff’s Offer of Judgment under O.C.G.A. He specializes in cases involving severe injury and wrongful death.įollowing the case’s trial, the Court awarded attorney’s fees of $3,250,000 and expenses in the amount of $63,040.25. Singleton has been practicing personal injury law in Atlanta for thirty (30) years. Jaccolah Johnson, through her Guardian and Conservator, her daughter, Rachel Tyler, are represented by Atlanta Personal Injury attorney, Donald W. This is the largest jury verdict ever recovered against the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA). The jury also found plaintiff to be 25% responsible, and the verdict was reduced accordingly to $18,750,000.00. On November 8, 2018, a Fulton County jury returned a record verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding damages to the plaintiff of $25,000,000. MARTA, Superior Court of Fulton County, State of Georgia, Civil Action File No. Contact us today at 40.Jaccolah Johnson, by and through her Guardian and Conservator, Rachel Tyler vs. if you or someone you care about suffered injuries in a MARTA bus accident. ![]() Make sure you speak with an Atlanta auto accident lawyer at the Law Office of Jason R. Claims against the government are complicated and have very strict time limits. To bring a claim against the City of Atlanta, victims must satisfy certain requirements. Bringing a Claim against the CityĪs described above, the City of Atlanta operates MARTA therefore, to bring a claim against MARTA is to bring a claim against the city. This does not excuse an injured party from having to prove that the fault was due to the negligence of the driver, but rather, simply holds the driver (and carrier) to a higher standard of care.ĭrivers engaged in any of the following acts fail to meet this increased duty.Įssentially, any operation of a common carrier vehicle that puts passengers or third parties at risk is a violation of the standard of care owed to them. § 46-9-1 provides that the presumption of the law is against them in the case of loss. Georgia law considers bus drivers “common carriers” and requires them to uphold a standard of "extraordinary diligence." O.C.G.A. What do victims need to do to hold a bus driver liable? Another driver: If another driver’s negligence caused the accident, that driver may be liable.If an auto shop’s incorrect repairs led to the accident, victims may be able to hold the auto shop liable. The bus manufacturer or auto shop: If the accident was due to a mechanical failure or some other equipment issue, the manufacturing firm or the company responsible for ensuring the operation of the buses may be liable.The city: Given that the City of Atlanta governs the transportation of passengers on its buses, the city itself may be liable for any MARTA accidents. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |